Print
|
Here's a story from today's Daily Xpress, which for some reason I cannot find on the paper's website: Film censorship
From the story, I gather that any film showing violence will be rated 13+, meaning people under 13 will not be allowed to see films with fighting, gunplay, war or gore. The attention to violence is a new development. Traditionally, violence has been allowed to unspool unfettered, while the censors were more worried about covering up nude bodies and pixellating sex scenes. And what if the film is in the troublesome, mysterious "P" category? Conceivably, this "P" (for propaganda) classification could contain any kind of film, such as the Naresuan movies, which were actually quite violent, and even had some nudity. Seems there will be some fine-tuning going on before the ratings comes fully into effect, as the story says. And, I would not be surprised if the ratings are never enacted - they would require too much accountability and loss of control on the part of the bureaucrats in the Ministry of Culture. They are more comfortable cutting and banning films than they are with giving permission for people, or even certain segments of people, to see them. As far as the transfer of censorship power from the Royal Thai Police to the Ministry of Culture, that is also in transition, so I don't expect to see much immediate effect from this. It is alarming that the people making the films and taking all the risks aren't being given a voice in the process, while various special interest groups like doctors and clergymen will have a major say on whether a film can be shown. The cinema licenses, "renting movies without permission", fines, etc., aren't going to impact the cinemas or average moviegoers either. But I do wonder about other venues that show films, like art galleries, as well as the film festivals. It'll be an interesting experience to see an international film festival are art gallery raided for showing an unlicensed film. And the threat of jail for film producers is pretty alarming, especially for the fact that "national security" and not pornography is invoked. Makes me think the Culture Police will be gunning for independent filmmakers. More information: |
| << | May 2008 | >> | ||||
| s | m | t | w | t | f | s |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |