• vetopower
  • ranking : General member
  • created : 2009-01-02
  • entry : 58
  • visitors : 44570
  • votes : 95
  • send msg :
veto's blog
Tuesday , April 10 , 2012
US-backed Cult Leader to Address Thai Followers in Cambodia.
Posted by vetopower , Reader : 1868 , 04:53:49  
Print


Bizarre US-backed Cult on Pilgrimage to Meet Exiled Leader

US-backed Cult Leader to Address Thai Followers in Cambodia.
by Tony Cartalucci

April 9, 2012 - While it is often called Thailand's "pro-democracy" movement, the "United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship" (UDD) or simply the "red shirts" have all the markings of a Pol Pot-esque personality cult and have already demonstrated a capacity for extreme violence and hysteria on par with any tale told of Kim Jong Ill's North Korea.





Video/Photo: Unlike in North Korea where tears were shed for "Dear Leader's" passing, these devotees to Thaksin Shinawatra, whose picture they clutch, are actually shedding tears for a court seizure of $1.4 billion of Thaksin's personal assets, criminally procured while holding public office. The video can be found here.
....


The UDD are devotees of Wall Street-proxy, billionaire, and former Thai prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, who has for decades served a pro-Western neo-liberal agenda of eroding Thailand's nationalist institutions and replacing them them with Wall Street and London-funded "civil society" networks. Thaksin, who served as Thai prime minister from 2001-2006 was ousted from power by a military coup. He has since used the UDD as cannon-fodder for an increasingly violent bid to return to power and steer Thailand back on course toward foreign servitude.





Images: The cult of Thaksin manifests itself as the UDD, or "red shirts." Despite attempts to portray it to the outside world as a "pro-democracy" movement, cult-like veneration of Thaksin dominates rallies, many of which feature an Orwellian "big brother" phone-in by Thaksin himself, who currently resides in Dubai. Media outfits like BBC, CNN, and others simply hope people don't read Thai, don't move too close to their monitors, and don't question what is clearly an unhealthy obsession with a billionaire politician. (click on images to enlarge)
....

The "Thaksin" Pilgrimage

In perhaps the most bizarre stunt to date, Thaksin is planning a mass pilgrimage for his Thai devotees to meet him, ironically enough in neighboring Cambodia, the crime scene of Pol Pot and his Khmer Rouge's (Red Khmers) genocidal rise to power. It is more than mere coincidence that Thaksin's cult of personality also identifies with the color red, is being hosted by Cambodian "president for life" Hun Sen, a former Khmer Rouge henchman himself, and is cultivating what for all intents and purposes is a modern day version of the Maoist-styled Khmer Rouge. Both movements were created to overthrow historical, indigenous national institutions, both were funded from the beginning by the West eager to overwrite both nations culturally, socially, and politically.





Video/Photos:
  Blood for the Billionaire. This is perhaps a close second for "most bizarre stunt" carried out by Thaksin's cult of personality. A "blood protest" carried out shortly after Thai courts seized billions of Thaksin's ill-gotten assets. Note in the photo montage the man in the lower left, around his neck is a Thaksin Shinawatra amulet. It is scenes like this where cult-like devotion transcends reasonable protests and ascends into the realm of the bizarre, dangerous, and irresponsible, especially when it is abundantly clear it is being carried out in the name of a man, not the pursuit of any given principle.
....

AFP reports in their article, "Ex-Thai PM Thaksin to address rally in Cambodia," that ""tens of thousands" of supporters in total are expected to greet Thaksin" in both Cambodia and another planned appearance in nearby Laos. And while AFP mentions the "warm ties" Thaksin maintains with Cambodian dictator Hun Sen, it fails to mention that Hun Sen has for years allowed Cambodia to serve as a staging ground for Thaksin's Wall Street-backed subversion. Thaksin's political proxies have fled to Cambodia for refuge after failed armed insurrections in both 2009 and 2010.



Photos: Top: Machete wielding thugs during 2009's failed insurrection. Bottom: The establishment of politically exclusive zones called "red villages" and "red districts" where Thaksin is literally declaring political monopolies and intimidating opposition from expressing themselves. While the UDD denies this is their intent - there have been horrific incidents of violence throughout UDD's northeast epicenter of support, including the infamous hacking to death of a radio DJ's father after speaking ill of the UDD - covered in an interview with red shirt propagandist Kanyapak Maneejak (DJ Aom) of the UDD's Chiang Mai Rak 51 faction. Kanyapak states that red shirt mobs were simply "following their hearts" when they butchered the old man outside the gates of his own home.
....

America's Next "Khmer Rouge"

Thaksin's "red shirts" are indeed led by a clique of self-confessed Maoists who are systematically building up a "people's power" movement built on political indoctrination camps and politically exclusive zones called "red villages," and now "red districts." This is done in accordance to Maoist "people's war" doctrine of politically monopolizing villages, then towns, then cities, and eventually entire provinces - a goal eagerly admitted to by UDD leaders. Anond Sangnan, the UDD's "secretary-general" in Thailand's Udon Thani province admitted in a Reuters interview that eventually, "the bigger goal is to carve out entire red districts and provinces."

Just like Cambodia's Khmer Rouge, Thaksin and his Wall Street sponsors plan to subvert Thailand's 800 year old royal institutions, the nationalist Thai military, and any form of political opposition - permanently and violently. And while Thakin's political devotees and their agenda are described in terms of indigenous democratic aspirations, in reality Thaksin and his movement have been, and still are servants of Wall Street and London.

Wall Street Proxy

Thaksin was a former Carlyle Group adviser, and recipient of extensive US backing, including lobbying services from fellow Carlyle member James Baker and his firm Baker Botts, warmonger Robert Blackwill of Barbour Griffith & Rogers, and PNAC signatory Kenneth Adelman of Edelman. During Thaksin's term in office from 2001 until a coup ousted him in 2006, upon the eve of which he was literally reporting to the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, he had committed Thai troops to the US invasion of Iraq and allowed the CIA to use Thailand for its abhorrent rendition program.

Photo: Deposed Thai prime minister, Thaksin Shinawatra sitting before the Council on Foreign Relations on the eve of the 2006 military coup that would oust him from power. Since 2006 he has had the full, unflinching support of Washington, Wall Street, and their immense propaganda machine in his bid to seize back power.

….


Thaksin has been living in self-imposed exile primarily in Dubai since being convicted and sentenced to two-years in prison for corruption. He runs his proxy political party through his own sister who was just recently elected as Thai prime minster with much backing from the West. While "democratic" aspirations are described as the primary motivation of the UDD's "red shirts" it is clear that it is a personality cult hinging entirely on Thaksin Shinawatra - so much so that bizarre, unprecedented stunts such as moving tens of thousands of impressionable, horribly exploited rural people across the border into Cambodia are done to bolster a movement that otherwise has no real political underpinnings.

In addition to direct support for Thaksin and his UDD, the US openly funds a network of fake-non governmental organizations (NGOs) like "Prachatai" to peddle propaganda on behalf of members within Thaksin's movement as well as movements operating on Thaksin's political peripheries, like the fraudulent "Nitirat" group.

Greater Geopolitical Implications: Target China

Of course, folding Thailand into Wall Street and London's neo-liberal unipolar world order is just one goal of getting Thaksin back into power. The greater geopolitical goal is to create an alliance of Southeast Asian nations to hinder the rise and expansion of China while serving Western corporate-financier objectives.

This was described in great detail by US policy wonk Robert Kagan who in his 1997 report, "What China Knows That We Don't: The Case for a New Strategy of Containment," claimed proxy regimes will have China "play Gulliver to Southeast Asia's Lilliputians, with the United States supplying the rope and stakes." Two of these "Lilliputians" are Thaksin's sister and current Thai PM Yingluck Shinawatra and Aung San Suu Kyi in neighboring Myanmar (Burma). This concept of realigning Southeast Asia behind US hegemonic aspirations in Asian was repeated again more recently by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in a Foreign Policy article tilted, "America's Pacific Century."


Image: Top: The "Lilliputians" though small in stature were collectively able to tie down the larger Gulliver from the literary classic "Gulliver's Travels." In the same manner, the US wants to use smaller Southeast Asian nations to "tie down" the larger China. Bottom: From SSI's 2006 "String of Pearls" report detailing a strategy of containment for China. While "democracy," "freedom," and "human rights" will mask the ascension of Aung San Suu Kyi to power, it is part of a region-wide campaign to overthrow nationalist elements and install client regimes in order to encircle and contain China has been long underway.

....

This "new strategy of containment" manifested itself fully when Thai PM Yingluck Shinawatra and Thai Foreign Minister Surapong Tovichakchaikul (Thaksin's cousin through marriage) pledged full support for the US agenda throughout Asia including a nuclear non-proliferation act opposed by China and the sovereignty-crushing Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) economic integration.

Yingluck has also pledged support for US designs toward Myanmar, ahead of Secretary of State Clinton's visit with Aung San Suu Kyi last December. Previously, during Yingluck's brother Thaksin's regime, Thailand, and in particular, the northern city of Chiang Mai, played a pivotal role hosting US corporate-funded "NGOs" working to foment sedition, unrest, and eventually regime change in neighboring Myanmar.

Should Thaksin manage to continue growing his violent cult of personality, the West may succeed in overwriting Thailand culturally, historically, socially, and politically just as the US-backed Khmer Rouge did to Cambodia. Cambodia today is a nation bent in absolute servitude to Wall Street and London, with nearly 50% of its territory belonging to foreign speculators and units of its military pawned off as private mercenaries to protect the holdings of foreign corporations. This will be Thailand's fate, and indeed the fate of Southeast Asia if Western hegemonic aspirations are not exposed and foiled - holding dire consequences for the region, particularly China, and tipping the balance of global power further in favor of Wall Street and London.

Read comment

comment 5
Plaadip date : 13/04/2012 time : 07.13
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/55555

I don't think highly of Sihanuk eiher. I just pointed out that those "veto power coutries" like US, UK, China, and other countries including mine, had supported the exile government including (actually KR was the main force of that) the leaders of the murderous regime for more than a decade, infliciting alot of pains on Cambodian people who were struggling to recover from the worst kind of genecide, starvation, loss of basic economic structure and the war...etc. I think this is a fact.
comment 4
Alien date : 12/04/2012 time : 21.22
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/alien

lonewolf is correct. Sihanouk allowed the N. Vietnamese to use his country as a refuge during the Viet Nam war. He allowed the Soviets and other eastern bloc countries to use his ports to arm the North Vietnamese. Depending on his moods, he allowed the U. S. to occasionally bomb N. Vietnamese troop or supply concentrations, but mostly not. he was trying to play off the east vs. the west and ended up, for the most part, supporting the east. He only became dismayed when he finally lost power and, as lonewolf says, that was his most important goal - not his people, not his country. The U. S. tried to support him during the war (as they did not like the KR) but Sihanouk pushed them away and worked against them ost of the time. Then he goes crying to them for help when the shit hit the fan. He was a questionable and unreliable ally (to be honest, he was an opportunist) and the U. S. treated him as he deserved to be treated. After coming to numerous accomodations with the Soviets and the KR and it didn't work out, he tried to come to an accomodation with the U. S. If the U. S. was able to put him back into power, he then probably would have come to another accomodation with the KR, given his history. If Sihanouk had strongly defended Cambodia's neutrality during the Viet Nam war, or sided with the U. S., he would most likely would have received the same support that Thailand did from the U. S. during that period. Sihanouk was a little boy playing with the big boys and lost.
comment 3
lonewolf date : 12/04/2012 time : 20.33

And it was quite logical for the US to ignore King Sihanouk who befriended the Khmer Rouge when they first came on the scene. But he quickly became frightened of them when they didn't keep him in the palace so he fled to China and lobbied them for support. Sihanouk never cared about his people, he was merely interested in keeping his throne and the adulation that came with it. He was a political fool who sacrificed the well-being of his people for his own goals. I live in a Cambodian-American community in California and they have little positive to say about this ex-king.

Also it might be a surprise to many Thai's--but the US really doesn't devote a lot of effort to the political machinations of Thailand. As long as the country maintains stability and stays away from China there is little concern for who is sitting as PM.
comment 2
Plaadip date : 12/04/2012 time : 14.35
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/55555

It's a bit complicated issue but I think vetopower is talking about the post liberation situation in Cambodia. After KR ousted by Vietnam, Sihanuke went to New York and made an appeal to bring the genocide regime to justice, only to be ignored by the US who gave more importance to her relationship with China. Sihanuke rut to KR after this. (I think Nayan Chanda wrote this in his "Brother enemy".)And the KR had kept his seat in the UN for long time, her "National Government" having cotinued to enjoy the support from the western camp calling Vietnam an agresser. If those with "vito power" had made a rightous decision in those days, we would not have had to see the "international tribunal" now, which is nothing more than a judical farce.
comment 1
Alien date : 12/04/2012 time : 08.07
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/alien

Vetopower - in your last paragraph, you reference the "US-backed Khmer Rouge". I think that would be news to alot of people. You should make millions off the book. Not to be nosy, but are you going to document any of this when you do write the book? Not that it matters.
Comment

  "If you are not member, please register to comment.
It take only a few steps."


  |  
name :  
email :  
website :  
comment :  
   
   

back top

<< April 2012 >>
s m t w t f s
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30