Print
|
The Premiere League announced it would wage a war on Internet piracy, according to the Guardian. This is good news indeed for the Premier League copyright holders including True Vision in Thailand. Yet it is alarming news for English football fans especially those who watch the games on Internet. I'm a True Vision subscriber and I have never missed any match I'd like to watch but I used to watch the match highlight on YouTube as there were fantastic goals that I never feel bored to watch repeatedly. After the Prem sued YouTube on copyright infringement, such video clips have disappeared. Replacing them is the new kind of slideshows that direct you to various websites which not only provides the highlights but also live broadcast of football matches from any world's major leagues. Many of my friends who don't want to pay for a Gold package of TrueVision, the Prem copyright holder in Thailand, watch football matches on Internet. The free-for-all live broadcast is also handy for those travelling to the provinces for many hotels don't provide the True sport channels in their entertainment menu. According to the Guardian, over a million viewers watch the games on the Net but I doubt that the figure is accurate for I believe that there are many more around the globe. The report cites a country with poor protection of intellectual property like China as the main source of broadcast piracy but the Premier League would be surprised if I say I have watched the recent one on a website from the United States. Although I understand the Prem owner's point as its broadcast right is violated, I also fall for many Prem fans who can't afford to pay. Some - me included - do watch pirated broadcast for other reasons. Considering the gloomy economy and the world's financial crisis, the crackdown must be serious than we have thought. I don't know what the next chapter would be. If Premiere League wants to compromise, they shouldn't condemn ISP for being irresponsible. It's difficult for them to keep track on website registrations when the hosts use the fake identities. As for the fans, if the Premier League really wants to do them a favour especially during the hard time, why don't they sell the rights at very modest rate to a few websites and each website may charge viewer like a very minimum pay-per-view like US$5 for a match?? I know the Prem may not listen and it is not the right time to find hospitality in the business - even the sport industry. But well, I just want to voice my concern. Now, I just pray that the Prem's crackdown is not so aggressive and abrupt that I can't find my next team's match highlight on the Net. I'll be heart-broken.
|
|
"If you are not member, please register to comment. It take only a few steps." member sign in | member register |
| << | January 2009 | >> | ||||
| s | m | t | w | t | f | s |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |