• Thanong
  • ranking : Nation Staff
  • email : thanong@nationgroup.com
  • created : 2007-07-02
  • entry : 279
  • visitors : 201300
  • votes : 316
  • send msg :
Thanong
Thanong Khanthong
Permalink : http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/thanong
Thursday , November 5 , 2009
Democrats divided over how to handle Saxena
Posted by Thanong , Reader : 269 , 19:43:19  
Print


November 5, 2009

Now that Rakesh Saxena is in Thai cus¬tody, will he reveal all?

It depends on the ruling Democrat Party. At this point, the Democrats are divided over how to handle Saxena as far as Korbsak Sabhavasu, the deputy prime minister in charge of economic affairs, and Suthep Thaugsuban, the deputy PM in charge of security affairs, are con¬cerned.

The Korbsak faction would like to use Saxena for political gain by going after key members of the Bhum Jai Thai Party and the nowdefunct Chart Thai Party.

In that case, Saxena would have to agree to a pleabargain deal with the Democrats in exchange for testimony that would implicate the politicians ben¬efiting from loans extended by the for¬mer Bangkok Bank of Commerce (BBC).

Saxena is now adjusting himself to his cell inside the Bangkok Remand Prison hospital. Corrections Department direc¬torgeneral Chartchai Sutthiklom said Saxena now looked brighter, because he was getting accustomed to his new envi¬ronment. The prisoner, he added, likes to have soft drinks, green tea and fast food.

The Democrats are going to assign Pol General Thanee Sapsomboon, a retired police officer, to handle the Saxena case. Thanee, who handled the sensational case involving the assassination attempt on Sondhi Limthongkul, has been appointed as adviser to the prime minis¬ter in charge of security affairs.

One political source said there was a high possibility he would replace Suthep as deputy prime minister in an upcom¬ing Cabinet reshuffle, should the rela¬tionship between Suthep and the Democrats reach the point of no return.

The Democrats still have an old score to settle with Suthep following his inept handling of the redshirt protesters who torpedoed the Asean Summit in Pattaya and ignited the bloody rioting during Songkran in Bangkok in April.

Since Suthep has banked his political fortune with the Bhum Jai Thai Party and the coalition partners, he most cer¬tainly does not want to pursue the BBC scandal in that it might link to other politicians.
It was he who in May 1996 exposed the loan scandal linked to the Group of 16 in a parliamentary noconfidence debate that led to the eventual closure of the bank.

Thirteen years later, Suthep is back¬tracking. Yesterday, he said the govern¬ment would let the police handle the Saxena case rather than invoke the Department of Special Investigation.

As for the censure debate on the BBC case in 1996, Suthep said he and his fel¬low Democrats had done their job and that it was now up to lawenforcement authorities to allow justice to run its course.
Suthep performed some fancy foot¬work with this reply, because he no longer wants to hurt Newin, his new ally.

Publicly, the Democrats have said it will be difficult for lawenforcement offi¬cers to trace the scandal to any politi¬cians who were behind the collapse of BBC. Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva has already made this clear.

Public prosecutors are building up the first case against Saxena by planning to charge him over the damage arising from BBC’s loan to City Trading.

One Democrat said: “It will be diffi¬cult to link the BBC scandal to politi¬cians like Banharn Silapaarcha, because he has already been banned from poli¬tics. Besides, the Chart Thai Party was also dissolved. As for Suchart Tancharoen, his subordinates might have been involved in the loan scandal, but legally how can he be implicated?”

Anyway, with Saxena in their hands, the Democrats appear to be willing to go for broke.
*********************************************************


Read comment

comment 3
wch date : 06/11/2009 time : 07.14
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/wch

Has this kind of the forecast ever existed in Thai media prior to Saxena having come ?.

Have Thai media ever asked why the extradition took so much time ?. They rather blamed Canadian government, instead blaming the negligence, or intentioned delay of Thai law enforcement services.

In early 90s, two banks were 'for sale'. The First City Bank of Bangkok and this, Bangkok Bank of Commerce, and many of Thai biz owners acted as the agents to allure foreign banking investors to buy the Thai banks. They wished foreigners didn't know much about two banks.

I was called by a Thai business owner who ran glass factory but now deceased, who asked me to cover the bank sales. I was given a bundle of documents - their financing reports. I tossed them into my garbage pail later.

Later Saxena came to Thailand as a Indian fund manager as Thailand was lack of same professionals. He acted as the consultant to BBC, not 'executive' as local reports now reports. Foreigner can not become the executive in local banking institute of 100 % local capital.

In this business, being a consultant usually has an implication of performing 'diligence work', the pre-evaluation work of the bank before real purchaser appear. A fund manager acts on behalf of own client. Saxena's involvement was looked prospective initially because it impressed an Indian bank will come to Thailand. Although a large Indian Thai population and most of them deal a handsome real estate business, there was no own bank.

BOT imposed commercial bank to obligatorily extend factory building investment money by giving them cheap policy call loan. If a commercial bank is reluctant, BOT penalized them by penal money as well as disadvanteous monetary support.
As this money flew in, BBC was briefly bullish and many local powerful figures sucked the honey pot.
Saxena might have acted an informal agent at some commission - 1-2 pct of dealt sum. (This is usually practise in banking business as called a part of spread or addressing commission).

BBC was deemed bankruptcy as wished by local borrowers. It is not Saxena who bankrupted the bank.
comment 2
notdisappointed date : 06/11/2009 time : 01.33

Panya, here's someting for you to consider.

If the 'injured parties' were to fiile charges it would take the police/DSI how long to investigate and charge those politicians that are guilty as sin? Don't forget the stature of limitations runs out next July. Do you really think an investigation can be performed and completed and charges filed before JUly next year?
comment 1
panya date : 05/11/2009 time : 20.54
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/diversion

Sorry, I don't understand.

Is there no means of public prosecution? Were there no 'injured' parties? It is said the country lost 200 billion from the BCC collapse - and there is no means of bringing a perpetrator to justice? Why has Thailand tried so hard to extradite him, if nothing can be done?

Why would it be difficult to link the scandal to people, if they were involved? Does the banning from politics or dissolving a party exonerate evidence? Do such people become different people so they cannot be held accountable? What is the purpose of the OAG? What is the function of the law?

Amazing that all the evidence (other than what Suthep said in May 1996) has disappeared.

May I ask again, what was the purpose and objective in extraditing Saxena? Merely for political gain, not justice? Is that not a farce?

Sorry, I don't understand.


Comment

  "If you are not member, please register to comment.
It take only a few steps."


  |  
name :  
email :  
website :  
comment :  
   
   

back top