• Thanong
  • ranking : Nation Staff
  • email : thanong@nationgroup.com
  • created : 2007-07-02
  • entry : 279
  • visitors : 201291
  • votes : 316
  • send msg :
Thanong
Thanong Khanthong
Permalink : http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/thanong
Saturday , September 5 , 2009
The dilemma of Japan
Posted by Thanong , Reader : 719 , 07:43:08  
Print


September 5, 2009

By Thanong Khanthong

The Japanese media, in their attempt to show a way out for their country facing a political transition, are still hooked to a "growth strategy". The followings are a summary of the Japanese media's commentaries (JP Morgan, August 28, 2009), written before the Democratic Party of Japan's earth-shattering victory. 

An article in the August 2 Nihon Keizai Shimbun called on the Liberal Democratic Party and the Democratic Party of Japan to contest Sunday's general election on the basis of concrete growth strategies for the nation's economy. It chastised the DPJ in particular for not even including growth strategy as a plank in its campaign platform. As to just what such a strategy should entail, the Nikkei suggested policies aimed at setting the stage for higher
corporate profits and increased employment.

• Growth strategy was also the topic of a piece in the August 24 Yomiuri Shimbun citing the absence of any real prospects for a full-scale recovery in Japan's economy. It cited the DPJ's failure to offer specific growth targets and said that it should do so if it wants to take power.
• The August 14 Asahi Shimbun carried an article on the need for a new industrial revolution for an aging Japan. It called on the political parties to turn trial into
opportunity and remake Japan for a more mature era, arguing that Japanese politics faces an unprecedented need for the kind of broad vision and imagination required for a new industrial revolution.
• An article on growth strategy in the August 26 Mainichi Shimbun advised a "reset" of Japan's vertically segmented administrative system. It said that while Japan has a wealth of excellent technologies, these remain stuck at the basic technology stage owing in part to the country's system of government administration. It concluded that an overhaul of the system and its links to industry is a key issue for the nation's growth strategy.

Japan suffered a burst of the economic bubbles in the early 1990s and it has yet to recover from that hangover. Over the past 15 years, the averaged growth rate of Japan is about 1 per cent. The Japanese voters gave the Democratic Party of Japan a landslide victory because they were quite worried about their future -- their pensions, their jobs, their healthcare and their security.

Yukio Hatoyama, the new leader, promises reform for Japan. But how far?

If Japan would like to keep its people happy, the new government under Yukio Hatoyama must raise the consumption tax to 15 per cent and steer the economy to achieve a growth rate of 2 per cent. That's why the Japanese media have been calling for the new government to devise a "growth strategy", and they are appalled that neither party is offering any. Some of them even want Japan to mount on a Second Industrial Revolution.

But can Japan continue to achieve a 2 per cent growth rate going forward? To achieve this growth rate, Japan needs further investment for exports. Without any resources, it has to import oil, coal, copper, iron ore, aluminium as raw materials before turning them into industrial goods. From a country of high ideals and culture, Japan has quickly turned itself into a robot society due to the industrial revolution. Land prices are beyond the reach of the common people.

Growth and prosperity are the buzzwords of the foundation of modern economic thinking. A country must grow its economy so that its people achieve prosperity and stability.

Japan's post-war economic machine is the wonder of the world. It has plunged on an industrial revolution. Within a generation, it is able to move forward to become the second largest economy in the world after the US. But this machine is now running into trouble.

For growth and prosperity have brought about excess production, excession consumption and also excess paper wealth creation. Japan has relied mainly on the US for growth and its security. It has agreed to be the supplier of goods mainly to the US. And the US has agreed to be the consumer of the goods from Japan. When Japan sells its goods to the US, it gets paper currency, which is not backed up by any assets, in return. Since people all over the world come to "believe" that the US dollar is a world reserve currency, they hold on to the US dollar as a store value of their wealth. The paper currency it earns from selling goods to the US goes back largely into buying the US Treasuries and debts to fuel further US consumption. Japan has been helping to prop up the US dollar so that it keeps its yen cheap to boost exports. It is a perfect master-slave proposition.

Now Japan has about US$1 trillion in foreign reserves. Soon other Asian countries -- South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Asean and China as the latest case -- followed Japan's export-led model.

The wealth of Japan goes into the construction of new buildings and investment in new plants and factories. There are cement buildings everywhere in Japan. The buildings also spread to the country-side to the extent that Japan no longer is interested in producing food to feed its people. It believes that it has enough money gained from selling industrial goods to import the food. Meanwhile, it treats its minority farmers with special privileges.

Japan is now caught in a dilemma of whether it will move forward with the industrial development or whether it will have to adopt a new economic model. This depends on its view of the global capitalism. If it believes that the world system is already overwhelmed by excess consumption, excess production and excess paper wealth creation, then it can't continue this course of industrial development further. In industrial production, Japan has to import the raw materials for production of finished products. It is also shifting its industries to the overseas. All of this industrial production is tied to the modern-day banking system.

Japan's per capita income is about U$33,800 compared to Thailand's US$4,111 (8 times larger). Japan's budget size is around US$1.6-US$1.7 trillion (35 times larger), compared to Thailand's Baht1.7 trillion. Japan's population doubles that of Thailand's 65 million.

Even though Japan is very rich compared to most other countries in the world, it is still very worried. Enough is never enough.   

The Democratic Party of Japan has already announced that it would shifted the country away from export-led growth. We shall see how it will implement this policy. Its leadership must have realised that the consumer age of modern-day capitalism has ended. The more Japan produces, the more it will have dead stock in its warehouses and factories. Even Paul Krugman, the Nobel prize winning economist, admits that the export-led nations would need consumers from another planet to purchase their goods because the planet earth people no longer have the money. 

An economic success is accompanied by overspending by the government. Most of the governments in the industrial world are facing the same disease of overspending to make the people happy with all the social security, pension and healthcare benefits. Japan's public debt now stands at 175% of GDP.

Japan has a choice of staying a course of industrial development and hangng on to the US or abandoning the US. If it stays with US by holding on to the US dollar reserves, in the end it might lose everything in the event of a US dollar collapse. Most of its wealth earned from industrial revolution now goes into dollar reserves, paper and buildings.

By the way, buildings are expensive to maintain. Japan would need energy and tenants to continue to use the buildings. In the end, they could become dead assets.

If Japan decides to save itself by converting the US$1 trillion reserves to pay off for the debt and holds on the course of self sufficiency instead of export-led growth, it might survive. The old capitalist course will not work because Japan will need at least 2% growth every year to sustain the public spendings and other costs. But over the past 15 years, average growth is 1% or less. Going forward it is even impossible to achieve 2% growth because that would require further huge investment in industrial development. The new investment would surely turn sour because the global consumption is disappearing fast.

Capitalism has arrived at its peak of overproduction, overconsumption and absurd paper wealth creation. The only way forward is downward adjustment to arrive at the real fundamental. But this is going to be a painful adjustment that few, including many among the Japanese, would dare to face.

If Japan were to dump the US for its own survival, that will accelerate the US collapse. But in the event, it might not survive either.

Unfortunately, China is following this very same pattern of industrial growth and consumption -- and destruction. 


Read comment

comment 15
wch date : 07/09/2009 time : 22.12
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/wch

Thailand can practise by area such as energy sufficiency. Ethanol can increase step by step up to 30% from present 10% (less than it).
Electricity production is not necessarily pegged to GDP growth in proportion but while pin down it less than 30,000mw of installation capacity, Thailand can find measure to double GDP growth. To do this, whole energy production and consumption system must be overhauled and rationalized.

Sufficiency can be achieved in transportation sector by ennovating whole logistic system including moving production facilities of Bangkok to consumer's cluster such as in the Isan and in the north.

Many areas are indeed wasteful in Thailand and grave rationalization effort is needed. This is a sort of sufficiency management.
comment 14
wch date : 07/09/2009 time : 21.28
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/wch

"If Japan does not want to invest its eco car project in Thailand, it is Japan's decision".
This is the principle of free market.
A state can not confine people in a standard.
comment 13
Thanong date : 07/09/2009 time : 20.24
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/thanong

wch: You still think in the old model. If Japan does not want to invest its eco car project in Thailand, it is Japan's decision. We can't do anything about it. We won't complain that it is unfair. Japan will find the most suitable site to build its eco car project and it has already shown its interest in Thailand.

Centralised planning has failed in the past. But decentralised planning is failing now -- in a big way too.

The world has yet to find a system of balance and sufficiency. Thailand will attempt to try this, starting probably next year if this or the new Thai government really has the understanding.
comment 12
Thanong date : 07/09/2009 time : 20.19
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/thanong

Plaadip: How can Japan continue to sell to US when more Americans are getting poorer. One out of nine Americans are on food stamps.


WASHINGTON (Reuters) – More than 35 million Americans received food stamps in June, up 22 percent from June 2008 and a new record as the country continued to grapple with the worst recession since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

The food stamp program, which helps cover the cost of groceries for one in nine Americans, has grown in step with the U.S. unemployment rate which stood at 9.4 percent in July.

The Labor Department will release August employment figures on Friday.

June was the seventh straight month in which food stamp rolls set a record. The average benefit in June was $133.12 per person.
comment 11
wch date : 07/09/2009 time : 19.50
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/wch

Thanong,
Conventional 3500 cc gasoline car ran at 6-7 km per a liter. So called eco-car of same cc runs at 11-12 km per a litre. If it is smaller engine of 1600cc, it runs more than 20 km instead of old 12 km.
Emission is extremely controlled, almost zero CO and NOx. New eco-car adopts ethanol upto 20% without problem.

Known automakers who developed this technology is not more than 5 globally. They invested huge R&D cost to develop this technology.
Break even point of production capacity must be not more than half a million cars a year and the minimum production facilities construction cost is not less than 2 billion dollars.

Let's say, Japan build this factory in Japan to employ own people to reduce own unemployment and export to Thailand. Thailand may feel 'unfair'.
Because Thailand so far offered huge consumers' market to Japan. A Japanese policy maker may think " We attributed much to Thai people to improve their life standard by supplying cheaper home appliance and cheaper cars".

Also Japanese may think "If we build eco-car in China, huge market is just there and we can transport Chinese eco-car via FTA of China-Thailand and still we have competitiveness".

These all are indeed the dilemma of Japan.
Sufficiency economy too must be globalized.
Without international collaboration, it is difficult to achieve sufficiency level.

If a country control economy tightly to achieve sufficiency, they have exceptional policy such as central power consolidation and nationalizing critical industry such as energy. This centrally managed economy system were failed as seen many in the past.
One good example is Argentina.
comment 10
Thanong date : 07/09/2009 time : 18.12
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/thanong

Plaadip:
Most of the developed countries, including Japan, face the problems of finding money to finance public services and spending to look after their peoples. But the world's opportunities to make money have already closed because the bubbles have burst. If we live by money, we have to die by money.
comment 9
Thanong date : 07/09/2009 time : 18.06
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/thanong

wch: eco car is the way to go. Going forward we can't afford to import oil. Environmental standard will become even more important in Thailand.
comment 8
Plaadip date : 07/09/2009 time : 10.21

Thanong, but the model cannot be agriculture based sufficiency economy as you suggested for Thailand. (Our food self-sufficiency rate is around 40 percent as you know)

Among Hatoyama's remarks, "cut off unnessesary public spending" sounds most similar to the "sufficiency theory" but it's rather a rethoric to get back to LDP when he was asked where he can get money to implement his election promises which give more direct financial support to households than cooperates.

Actually I support this policy direction for Japan, though doubt if they can create a financial source from the efforts as much as they claimed in their manifesto. But as for Thailand, I think, you need more public investment to develop public infurstructures. For example, does Bangkok has its ADSL network as good as Ho Chi Min? I simply can't believe that the world will change to a place where such kind of investment will come to nothing.
comment 7
wch date : 06/09/2009 time : 15.36
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/wch

Thanong,
As reported today, AV government press Japan to invest on Eco-Car production in Thailand.
What would you say about this ?
comment 6
Thanong date : 06/09/2009 time : 15.19
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/thanong

In that regard, you need a new model.
comment 5
Thanong date : 06/09/2009 time : 11.13
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/thanong

Plaadip:
I replied to you in literal term. Yes, there is always a foreign market for you. But the foreign market is not large enough to justify your excess production and excess investment, which leads to excess consumption and then fears that there is not enough to look after your social safety net.
comment 4
Plaadip date : 06/09/2009 time : 10.42

Thanong, no foreign market? I think nowadays you skimp on words too much, and cause misunderstanding. Or do you literally believe that? It that's true, yeah, we are finished.
comment 3
Thanong date : 05/09/2009 time : 21.35
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/thanong

Plaadip:
There is no more foreign market.
comment 2
Plaadip date : 05/09/2009 time : 19.37

I think Tanong is talking about his NY times essay which published one month ago. The day after, the party's secratery genearal gave the interview that it did not mean Japan will sell the governemnt bonds out. I don't think the coming MOF, Fujii would do such a thing too. How can we pay our national debt back if we lose our most important foreing market?
comment 1
wch date : 05/09/2009 time : 08.03

The most frequent mistakes of Japan economy watchers is only to focus on its dometic economy (GDP).

Japan's export dependence is less than 30%.
Since 90s, 30% production facilities were moved to the overseas markets, mainly China and Asean.
Oversea production yields 30%, a great portion of GNP.

China rose up the most important trade and investment counterpart and China is eager to invite more production facilities from Japan to China.

The real agenda of DPJ government is to boost domestic consumption and investment on high tech products that are marketable in both domestic and overseas market.
DPJ's imminent policy is to overhaul and improve welfare system, education and international relation.
Comment

  "If you are not member, please register to comment.
It take only a few steps."


  |  
name :  
email :  
website :  
comment :  
   
   

back top