Print
|
February 8, 2008 If Tarisa Watanagase, the Bank of Thailand, were a patient, she must have been staying in an intensive care unit by now. What would be her reaction if the surgeon were to emerge into the operating and he turns out to be Dr Surapong Suebwonglee holding his sharp knives? Tarisa is now on the defensive. Dr Surapong, the finance minister, will be holding talks with her next week to discuss the possibility of removing the capital controls altogether. Surapong spoke during the political campaign that if elected as government, he would like to remove the capital controls.
Tarisa: on the operating table Samak Sundaravej, the prime minister, has also indicated that the government is considering to move capital controls, although it will have to discuss with the central bank first. He understands that it is a delicate issue because the government may be trampling on the turb of the central bank. Tarisa and her central bank officials are facing a dilemma. If they were forced to remove the capital controls, they would bear the consequence in case that the baht shoots through the roof again. There has been steady pressure on the baht, which is on the upward trend. If the baht gets stronger, the export sector and several other industries would get hurt. The central bank would be solely to blame. What is the real situation then? Surapong looks determined to remove the capital controls. He might introduce tax measures to impose on short-term capital instead of giving the central bank a blank cheque to curb the short-term money. Tarisa and her team are ready to fight back. Next week they will be arming themselves with documents and data to support a need to maintain the capital controls, although most of the administrative measures under the capital controls have been relaxed. They are confident that once Surapong has digest the central bank's report, he should think twice before moving to abolish the capital controls altogether. Another problem with Tarisa's central bank is that the supervisors of the banking institutions have been very tough with the commercial banks. Rules on banking supervision have been tightened, forcing the commercial banks to set aside reserves to account for doubtful loans. The definition of the doubtful loans differs significantly between the central bank supervisors and the commercial bankers. Smaller banks, in particular, have been hard hit by the supervision tightening since they need to scramble for capital to set aside as reserves. The bankers have been grumbling about this. You have to understand that imposing or removing capital controls lies in the jurisdication of the central bank. With this strong wind of political change, you can feel that it is a matter of time when the politicians will step in to clean up the central bank. The Surapong's team of advisors does not seem to have high regard for the central bank at this point. The capital controls, introduced in December 2006, have dealt a serious blow to the financial markets. Tarisa's handling of the baht operation had run into trouble before the situation has improved since the last part of 2007. We have to keep an eye on this story next week. Still, if in the end, the central bank is forced to abolish the capital controls, what would be other support measures to cushion the baht in the event that short-term capital flows in massively to speculate against the baht? The central bank would be challenging the Finance Ministry to come up with further recommendations. |
|
"If you are not member, please register to comment. It take only a few steps." member sign in | member register |
| << | February 2008 | >> | ||||
| s | m | t | w | t | f | s |
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | |