• Thanong
  • ranking : Nation Staff
  • email : thanong@nationgroup.com
  • created : 2007-07-02
  • entry : 111
  • visitors : 60124
  • votes : 53
  • send msg :
Thanong
Thanong Khanthong
Permalink : http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/thanong
Friday , February 1 , 2008
Dr Liap and capital controls
Posted by Thanong , Reader : 791 , 13:19:19  
Print


February 1, 2008

Dr Surapong Suebwonglee, alias Dr Liap, has told reporters that the new government would remove capital controls once it is in power. This is a rather bold statement, coming from one of the most powerful persons in the People Power Party and a confidant of Thaksin Shinawatra.

Surapong faces the first test over capital controls

The following day, Tarisa Watanagase, the Bank of Thailand governor, said with the global financial volatility, it might not be appropriate to end the capital controls at this juncture.

As you can see, Tarisa, who has spent most of her central banking career in the supervision department, is a tough lady. She has fought the Finance Minisry's attempt to reclaim the power to supervise the banking and finance institutions from the central bank. Now she is defending the central bank's masterpiece policy of capital controls imposed in late 2006 to curb the baht rise.

As the baht has broken through the Bt33/dollar to the Bt32/dollar level, the authorities are having a hard time managing the baht stability. Allowing the baht to strengthen further would hamper the export growth. Exports remain the strong engine of the Thai growth, although this year domestic demand should feature more promiently in government policy.

"Removing the capital controls at this juncture is the worst timing. We should wait a bit longer until the situation improves," a senior banker told me. The banker did not agree with capital controls in the first place.

But now that the capital controls have been put in place and have been watered down quite significantly since their introduction, it would be better off to wait for a while until the financial storm hitting the US subprime loan market has passed over.

This has already created a dilemma to Surapong, who has yet to formally be appointed as finance minister. If he goes ahead to remove the capital controls, he would risk allowing the baht to strenthen quickly and harm the Thai exports. If he backs off, he would be seen as swallowing his own words in the early part of his tenure.

By the way, managing capital controls lies in the power of the Bank of Thailand governor -- not the finance minister. So it is rather strange that the government can interfere in the administrative measures of the central bank.

***************************************************

Speaking about the Samak Cabinet in the making, most of us are feeling rather frustrated with the whole selection process. From the start, we weren't sure whether Samak would be really nominated as prime minister as Banharn Silapa-archa was also waiting in the wing.

Even now we aren't sure who will be the head of the economic team of the Samak government. Mingkwan Saengsuwan has been sending out signals that he is the economic tzar of the Samak government. He will be serving as deputy prime minister and also commerce minister.

In this case, will Dr Liap, as finance minister, have to report to Mingkwan? Apparently, both of them are not finance men. Mingkwan is a good marketing guy, while Dr Liap is more of a strategist rather than a public policy makers. Samak Sundaravej, the prime minister, is not well versed in economic matters either.

So who is actually the economic tzar? It looks like Surapong is getting an upperhand over Mingkwan.

The message from the People Power Party is that we should not worry about the economic ministers because the party has a strong staff support team. All ministers will have to follow the party's guidelines.

Does that mean Surapong is going to simply be serving as nominee finance minister? Surapong may be working under the shadow of Dr Thanong Bidaya, the former finance minister under the Thaksin government. Thanong is one of the most trusted aides of Thaksin as he used to be his fund manager. Thanong should be working as a tutor for Surapong.

Uhmm.. runing the country's economic policy requires the best mind. The finance minister can't go back to seek consultation with the People Power any time there is a crisis in the stock market or in the baht currency.

We don't know the face of the economic ministers of the Samak more than a month after the general election. This can only mean that there have been frantic negotiations or horse trading behind the scenes among the six-party coalition government for the Cabinet portfolios.  

There is no unity at all the economic team of the Samak government in the making because the ministers will come from different parties. The People Power controls the Finance Ministry, the Commerce Ministry, and the Transport and Communicaty Ministry. The Puea Pan Din Party takes over the Industry Ministry and the ICT Ministry. The Chat Thai heads the Agriculture Ministry and the Sports and Tourism Ministry. The Ruamjai Thai Chat Pattana gets the Energy Ministry.

Now how are these ministers going to coordinate to achieve unity in their policy implementations?

Pretty soon, they will start fighting for the pies. At the same time, Thailand will also get the hit from the US subprime market meltdown. Things do not look rosy for the Samak government's economic team from the outset.

 


Read comment

comment 5
MakubeX date : 04/02/2008 time : 11.01
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/babylon

In my experience, doctors should just be doctors or officials in the health service. They make pretty poor administrators and political commentators.
comment 4
Ian date : 01/02/2008 time : 19.05
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/anterian36

I can buy local grown fresh veg of the street mobiles, but they are grade 2 quality. Supermarkets are better but most veg seems to be imported from Australia. I am experimenting with growing my own:-)
comment 3
Dalmasian date : 01/02/2008 time : 18.41

Maybe they will buy some produce from Thailand, but I rally doubt it. By the time the produce they buy here reach China they will be inedible. Thailand does not seem to have the technology to keep far produce fresh until they reach the markets and be able to last for several days. Moreover, Thailand does not have enough quantity to export and feed the population of even one Chinese province. I don't know about you, but my wife and I miss the fresh vegetables that we used to buy in Hong Kong wet markets, most of which comes from neighboring Guangdong province. thai vegetables just cannot compare in taste and quality. Not at all.
comment 2
Ian date : 01/02/2008 time : 16.12
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/anterian36

I am not an economist, but I read that because of the extreme Arctic conditions in much of China they are expecting massive crop failures. Presumably this means they will be shopping around for agricultural produce, I am wondering how this will affect Thailand.
comment 1
Dalmasian date : 01/02/2008 time : 15.17

I think people should refrain from saying that capital controls is good for the country if they do not fully understand the situation. Do not pretend to be economists when you are not one.
Tarisa's "masterpiece policy" of capital controls . . . my &ss! Capital controls is never a good thing foe any country. It is oly practiced by immature countries with incompetent financial, economics and monetary authorities. The bloody idiot of the BOT thinks she is doing a good job, doesn't she? Ask her to provide details of how much the country's Trasury has "lost" in foreign exchange because of the BOT's manipulations in the foreign exchange market to artificially prevent the Baht from appreciting. Is she brave enough to admit her mistakes have caused the counry to suffer badly financially? All that she is doing is delaying the eventual appreciation of the Baht rather than "control" it's exchange rate artificially.
The truth is, the country has been quite successful in its export activities and there has been a flood of US dollars comng in, which exporters have had to convert to Baht according to BOT regulations. When there is more demand for baht versus the US dollars, it is only natural for the baht to appreciate. On the other hand, if exports should suffer as a result of the US economy slowing down, then there will be less demand for the Baht and it's exchange value will decrease.
The situation is the US dollar is depreciating against all major curriencies around the world. It is not the Baht appreciating. Tell me, did the Baht appreciate against the Euro? No! Did it appreiate against the Canadian dollar? No! Did it appreciate against the British Pound? No! Did it appreciate against the Swiss Franc? No! Did it appreciate against the Singapore dollar? No! Did it appreciate against the Koreas Won? No! Did it appreciate against the Japanese Yen? No! So, what do these idiots mean when they proclaim that the Baht's exchange rate is "too high" and must be stopped?
Also, which foreign fund really want to come into Thailand with their dollars at this point in time when the PPP just came into power? The Thai capital markets have been one of the worst performing in Asia during the past few years. Many foreign funds have expressed their intention of moving out of Thailand in search of greener pastures elsewhere because of the deplorable political situation in the county. When one sees "farang" buying in the stock market here (like what is hapening these 2 days out of the blue) one should be aware that it may very well be the "invisible hand" in London or Hong Kong who is manipulating the market like he always do when he was in power and even when he was out of power. The SET is not the darling of the investment world.
In case people here do not know or has forgotten what tey have read in the newspapers, among Asian countries Thailand depends the most on exports for its economic growth, to the tune of about 70%. This, in a country with over 60 million population, is a very unhealthy development. If it were to happen to Singapore or Hong Kong, it would be understandable because of the very limited population in those two territories. But for Thailand, how come the country is not developing it's own domestic markets to ensure a steady growth in domestic demand rather than excessively depending on exports of cheap and low-tech products to spur econmic growth?
This is the basic problem with the economy of this 3rd-world country. It wants to export a lot of low priced agricultural products and low-tech industrial products in competition with 4th world countries that can offer even cheaper land and labor. When it cannot compete, exporters cry foul and demand the government "protect" them from "unfair" competition. The toothless and visionless government, pressured by these exporters (and who knows what kind of personal benefits the very corrupt government officials obtains for themselves) do irrational things and try to cover them up by all kinds of lame excuses. And of course, most of the people do not even know what is going on because of their ignorance, couldn't care less.
As for Dr Surapong Suebwonglee, I feel he is more suited to work in the Ministry of Public Health with his medical training and background. I do not know how good a medical doctor he is, but he is definitely not a financial person and has no right or qualifications to ne a Finance Minister. And it is most laughable that Mingkwan Saengsuwan considers himself as the economic tzar of the country. If these jokers are the best that PPP can offer, I think the country is in for a really long and cold winter of discontent.
So, the show continues and the soap opera gets to be played another day.
Comment

  "If you are not member, please register to comment.
It take only a few steps."


  |  
name :  
email :  
website :  
comment :  
   
   

back top