• korbsak
  • ranking : Honourary Member
  • email : ksabhavasu@gmail.com
  • created : 2007-08-06
  • entry : 7
  • visitors : 22024
  • votes : 25
  • send msg :
putting the people first
Sunday , August 26 , 2007
Who is the Client? Temasek or Thaksin
Posted by korbsak , Reader : 8905 , 13:05:26  
Print


                             Who is the Client ? Temasek or Thaksin

Surin Upatkoon, the main shareholder in the controversial Kularb Kaew Co, was yesterday charged with a criminal offence for alleged illegal representation of a foreign company under the Foreign Business Act 1999.

Acting police chief Seripisut Temiyavej said that Fairmont Investments Group, based in the British Virgin Islands, would also face criminal charges under the act.

In his testimony given last September, Surin claimed that he had financed his investment in the company with his own money.

He also insisted he was not a nominee of the Singaporean government's investment arm, Temasek Holdings.

The above was published by The Nation on 25 August, 2007.

            Not much. The police was not willing to provide anymore details of what went behind the scene.

            Let us look at the fact:

            On 10 March 2006 Datok Surin wrote a check worth 2,720 million baht to Kularb Kaew Co, for payment of his shares, from his very own account at Siam Commercial Bank. The cash was withdrawn in the afternoon; however, the very same amount was deposited into this account from an offshore company called Fairmont Investment Group, based in BVI. in the morning, same day.

            Furthermore, the investigation conducted by the Ministry of Commerce revealed that this offshore account was with the Credit Suisse Bank in Singapore ,  under the name of Fairmont Investment Group. Things get more complicated, when it was found that the owner, Fairmont, was not the one that has the authority to withdraw the cash. The payment instruction was from the company called Green Land Company limited.

            One can easily assume that Green Land is definitely the owner of the mystery 2,720 million baht. Interesting enough, Datok Surin also admitted that the investment money was not his. He borrowed them from Fairmont!!

            Who is the man behind the scene that is so very kind to Datok Surin, kind enough to lend him over 2 billion baht cash to invest in Kularb Kaew.

            We need to take a close look at Fairmont or, rather, the real owner, Green Land Company Ltd.

               The following is new stuff, posted especially for Nation blog members krub.

            Green Land Company Limited was established in Brunei. Here is the address:
Britannia
House 41, 4th Floor, Cator Road Bandar Seri Begawan, BS8811 
Brunei Darussalam 

            Further digging krub:   Having the name and with the help of Goggles, more fact reveals.

            There is a company called Heritage Trust Group that is sharing the same address as Green Land Company limited. Heritage Trust Group is also at  Britannia House 41, 4th Floor, Cator Road Bandar Seri Begawan, BS8811   Brunei Darussalam.

                 Another surprise!!They both also shared the same correspondence addresses in Singapore as well. Here it is: 50 Raffles Place #15-05/06 Singapore Land Tower  Singapore 048623 

             Who are the Heritage Trust Group? Two names came up:   Dr Angelo Vernados  and  NG GEOK LAN

             Dr Angelo Vernados   is currently founder of the Heritage Trust Group,Singapore, a provider of offshore companies, nominee and trust services to the legal, accounting and private banking sectors throughout South East Asia and the Middle East.

                            Ref:http://www.intellitrain.biz/team_advpanel.php

 NG GEOK LAN   also sits on the board of Heritage Trust Group. He is the one that authorize the 2,720 million baht on behalf of Green Land Company Ltd.

From the above, we can conclude that the money invested in Kularb Kaew that was supposed to be from the Thai entity is no longer valid. The money was from offshore account, managed by Singaporean company that provided what they call “ Wealth Management Services”.  Dr Angelo Vernados and NG GEOK LAN  are merely nominees, part of the services, that the company provided to the client.

When Surin cried out loud that he was not a Tamesek nominee. I truly believe in him. Tamesak belongs to Singaporean Government. No reason for the Government to arrange such a set up. I cannot help myself recalling on my very first theory that Thaksin never did sell his shares?  So, who is the client? Temasek or Thaksin. Your guess is as good as mine.

BTW: If you can read Thai and rich enough, you may want to click on http://www.korbsak.com/talk_500420.htm  to get more information on “Wealth management services ”. ha ha

 

 

 

 

 

 


Read comment

comment 17
abcdefg date : 28/09/2007 time : 15.20

Move on People, isn't it enough of Thaksin already ?
Is there no other more important topic of my country now ? What's wrong with you people ?
comment 16
Ian date : 29/08/2007 time : 03.00
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/anterian36

Poomjai, I'm not quite sure what kind of blog you have in mind, "personal anecdotes of dealings with the boys in blue" perhaps? :-)
comment 15
Poomjai date : 28/08/2007 time : 09.10

:-)

Maybe the rural beat officer in Hook had a few too many pints of Abbot during his lunch time symposium in the Red Lion and was too lazy to stick you on (as they say)! This must call for a separate blog, don't you think?
comment 14
Ian date : 28/08/2007 time : 02.23
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/anterian36

Poomjai, many years ago I used to sometimes lecture at Bramshill (the police staff training college). The food was "Cordon Bleu" and each seat at dinner had an embossed crest of the college on the menu for that seat. I discovered that leaving this menu, crest uppermost, on my passenger seat gave me freedom to park with immunity in "no parking" zones.
comment 13
Poomjai date : 28/08/2007 time : 00.04

Ian,

I wonder if you heard that saying in Thailand? :-) I once heard it said (by a Chief Superintendent who had just been nicked for speeding) that a traffic officer will think that a Porsche is driving at 80 mph if it is parked at the side of the road!

So no offence taken dear chap. Just remember never to tell me your licence plate number! :-)
comment 12
Ian date : 27/08/2007 time : 23.06
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/anterian36

Poomjai, a lovely definition that I once heard is that a policeman is a criminal who prefers to work for a organisation rather than go freelance. I think most motorists would agree with this:-)
Don't take me too seriously
comment 11
Poomjai date : 27/08/2007 time : 18.44

Khun Ian

Ease up on the stick old boy. Red and White wants to join the Hampshire Constabulary! And he doesn't seem like a villain to me. If he supported the Pompey it might be a different matter of course. :-)
comment 10
Ian date : 27/08/2007 time : 18.41
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/anterian36

Greg, the problem with criminals is one of both degree and definition, we use tame wolves to guard sheep, we call them dogs. Similarly we use tame criminals to guard people, we call them policemen. It is said that the line between a policeman and a criminal is very thin, they think and behave in similar ways, and it is easy to cross that thin line.
Philosophically, a criminal cannot exist in a society without laws, it is by creating laws that we define the criminal.
There is no universal definition of where the line is drawn between a criminal and a non criminal.
comment 9
Poomjai date : 27/08/2007 time : 18.13

Hahahaha, good point my dear Dell nostalgic. You are absolutely right, my view is subjective. And people may well find my references to football dull.

I should therefore like to add, with this blog, an official correction to my entry:

STARTS:

....Simply that Khun Korbsak makes, what appears in my opinion to be a crushingly dull and convoluted blog, more to the point...."

ENDS

I hope that is better?
comment 8
redandwhitestripes date : 27/08/2007 time : 13.01
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/reallifethailand

Ian, I don't think that's related to the point we were making: should criminals be prosecuted or not? Do we sit back and refuse to make the effort to catch bad guys just because we can't catch all of them?

Poomjai, interesting comments but I think it's unfair to call this blog "dull". I enjoyed it because I find it interesting to trace suspicious transactions. Interesting blogs are subjective. For example, I enjoy your blog because we both love football but would it not be dull for someone who disliked football? :-)
comment 7
Poomjai date : 26/08/2007 time : 22.36

I wasn't siuggesting forgetting Thaksin or not forgetting him. Simply that Khun Korbsak make his crushingly dull and convoluted blog more to the point, as Ian also agreed.

The focus of this debate doesn't necessarily need to be on forgetting, moving on, changing the system (hmmm, like to hear more on that one) and taking off ties (Catch, you are cute as a button). But if as our Super Saint pointed out, we try to hold people to account for their mis-deeds then I would personally recommend letting the due process of law play out its proper role and function in the case of Thaksin et al. This would be a better alternative to trial by media and blog (see how well that worked with OJ), if of course the courts can prove themselves capable of operating free from political influence.

Democrats talking like scratched records (or rappers indeed - yo Korbsak, gimme some skin bruvva) and failing to work on developing a far reaching policy portfolio that will give them national reach and appeal to the electorate could possibly lead to:

- the large constituency of voting Thais 'oop coontry' continuing to hold said square jawed northern football lover in high esteem;

- those same salt of the earth luk tung loving darlings, continuing to feel no affinity to the handsome but rather cerebal and 'out of touch' seeming, pampered old Etonian;

- the spatula wielding ex-gubanatorial chap with the grey Brigitte Niellson haircut cruising to victory in December (or whenever) as the TRT proxy.

Because when all the debate, hot air, and financial service plugs are said and done, what will matter most is how people vote on election day. Thaksin bashing and wearing yellow jackets, ties, polo-shirts every day probably won't be enough, in my opinion.

So change the, change the, change the record bro, yo yo yo!
comment 6
Ian date : 26/08/2007 time : 20.39
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/anterian36

Greg, the best way to forget Thaksin would be to make Thailand a better place now he has gone, in fact it has become a worse place.
People are looking back on the good old days, not the bad old days.
Thaksin did bad, but he also did good, the new lot needs to do better before he can be forgotten.
As to changing things, how do you change it when on the one hand is apathy, and on the other hand manipulation of information, and I'm talking globally here?
I think you are displaying a faith in the innate goodness of human nature, I lost that years ago.
comment 5
redandwhitestripes date : 26/08/2007 time : 19.29
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/reallifethailand

BTW For all the farangs with the knee jerk "let's forget him" response, consider that the "new" PPP has a whole host of ex TRT members as well as relatives and that lawyer of Thaksin's who may as well have "Please punch me" tattooed across his forehead.

Thaksin still has a great influence on Thailand and no amount of "forget him" will change that. His people are still here, the system has not changed. To get rid of him completely it's
important to expose his wrongdoings and educate as many people as possible. Then he can be forgotten.

JMO
comment 4
redandwhitestripes date : 26/08/2007 time : 19.08
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/reallifethailand

You know my feelings on those questions Ian. Two wrongs do not make a right. The more we sit back and say "well it always happens" the more freedom that gives criminals.

There is no magic wand to take out all the fraudsters or crooks in one go, we have to tackle as many as we can. If Thaksin (or Conrad Black or anyone else) can be made an example of, it might work as a small deterrent that moves towards the goal you suggested, changing the fraud culture. A small difference most likely but the longest journeys start with a single step.

The alternative is what? Sitting back and allowing every criminal to run free and saying "We can't change it so why bother?"
comment 3
Ian date : 26/08/2007 time : 18.26
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/anterian36

I suppose I could work it out if I drew a flow chart, but at the end I was left wondering what point are you trying to make?
Yet again, a cynical part of my mind asks, does it really matter? The jungle is full of tigers, remove one and others move into his territory.
Off shore companies, holding companies, dummy companies, Thaksin didn't invent them he used the existing structures. The global financial structures are corrupt, no good just shooting one of the local tigers, you have to clean out the jungle.
comment 2
catch22 date : 26/08/2007 time : 16.41
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/catch22

What a load of crap!!

The ref is over - move on - take off your tie, buy a coloured shirt - get a life - chill out for a while.
comment 1
Poomjai date : 26/08/2007 time : 15.23

To be honest Kkun Korbsak, your blogs might have more impact if you wrote something punchy which encapsulate the key facts and conclusions. This is rather difficult to follow and, as it is on the subject of Thaksin (who I thought for you was a non-issue) my eyes glazed over after the first para, tiret or whatever....

Do you pay for advertising on the Nation Blog?
Comment

  "If you are not member, please register to comment.
It take only a few steps."


  |  
name :  
email :  
website :  
comment :  
   
   

back top

<< August 2007 >>
s m t w t f s
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31