• korbsak
  • ranking : Honourary Member
  • email : ksabhavasu@gmail.com
  • created : 2007-08-06
  • entry : 8
  • visitors : 48556
  • votes : 47
  • send msg :
putting the people first
Wednesday , August 22 , 2007
Bye - bye Baker Botts
Posted by korbsak , Reader : 4321 , 16:40:42  
Print


Bye - bye  Baker Botts

Thaksin and his lobbyists Part Two

                Barbour Griffith & Rogers, LLC.  is not the only lobbyist firm hired by Thaksin.

                Baker Botts has also been hired by Thaksin on 11 December 2006, few months after the coup. No need to waste time on who Baker & Botts are, the name “Baker” is good enough to guarantee the super connection with present US administration on the capital hill.  

               So what’s next! 

              Thaksin ended the contract with Baker Botts on 30 June 2007, a bit over 6 months period. Damage to Thaksin’s deep pocket is in the neighborhood of US $80,000, not much at all.


   

   

(The above document is from the lobbying report filed with the US senate office)

               This should not be of a surprise though; Baker Botts is not truly a lobbyist firm by its nature. The firm is full of lawyers having operation and offices worldwide. Do not be fool with the ending of Baker Botts role, my friends. Thaksin is continuing using their service but the scope of the service now covers the legal issues and the work assignment has been relocated to Houston office, managed by Mr. Michael  Goldberg.

                Below is the news release ( partially ) from the firm: 

HOUSTON, June 12 /PRNewswire/ -- - Statement from Michael Goldberg; Chair of the International Dispute Resolution Section at Baker Botts LLP.

The seizure of Dr. Thaksin Shinawatra's assets by a committee appointed by the coup leaders represents a major escalation in the Thai military junta's willingness to trample internationally accepted norms of due process and rule of law. The junta's action evinces a willingness to continue its one-track political vendetta against our client, Dr. Thaksin, even though he has repeatedly emphasized his willingness to assist in the reconciliation process that is critical to Thailand's return to democracy and stability…………… The junta's attacks on Dr. Thaksin amount to an arbitrary interference with his privacy and his family, his private property, his business interests as well as his honour and reputation which is abhorrent to principles of international justice………………………… The junta's decision to escalate its persecution of Dr. Thaksin has set back efforts to progress Thailand back to civilian rule and democracy……………………….. We have been authorized by Dr. Thaksin to vigorously evaluate all international options to protect his rights and interests. 

            Well, as far as where things stand at the moment, Mr. Goldberg will probably has his hand full  and will be making tons of money now that Thaksin may need his London office to help with the extradition case in the very near future. 

What about Barbour Griffith and Rogers, LLC?   

They are still very active as of now. The record shows that they make US$ 460,000 for 6 months worth of work. The report also provides some information on the agencies that they have been visiting within the past 6 months.

 

  

   


 

                The above clearly shows that they have been busy. Probably to justify the invoices, don’t you think?

                May be not if you look carefully at the last line of item 17, USAID, why?  It has been a decade that we have not heard of this agency. They do not even have the office here. I did some probing and, interesting enough, found that they are still active with the peace and security issue in Thailand. 

Peace and Security: Helping Marginalized Communities
Uneven economic growth, ethnic tensions, political repression, human rights abuses and the aftermath of war in Southeast Asia all put stress on communities, including Burmese migrants, ethnic minorities in the Central Highlands of Vietnam and war victims in Laos. USAID works to improve conditions for these groups.
In southern Thailand, USAID has educational reform and civil society activities to reduce conflict and counter terrorist propaganda through increased dialogue between the Islamic community and the Government of Thailand.

Ref: http://kenya.usaid.gov/locations/asia_near_east/countries/rdma/ 

            Personally, I think Thaksin is quite concern with the human rights abuse issues both from his extrajudicial killings during the anti drug campaign policy and his handling of the terrorist in the Southern provinces. Apart from that, I see no reason why he would want to spend so much money on the lobbyist. Again, when you have the kind of money he has, nothing can go wrong, right?






Read comment

comment 19
Poomjai date : 27/08/2007 time : 18.04

A very good point and well put Khun Ian.

Like you I feel wary of being seen as a Thaksin apologist, which I certainly am not. Sins there were aplenty, as well as some successes, it must be said.

What bores me most about the current Government crop is hearing about corruption under Thaksin's watch. Some of his Ministers were venally corrupt and many people will be glad to see the back of them. But let's say it as it is: corruption did not start with Thaksin nor end with the coup.
comment 18
Ian date : 27/08/2007 time : 17.38
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/anterian36

Ever since I started coming to Thailand I have been aware of the sins and virtues of Thaksin. On balance the sins were greater and I was glad to see him go. But the mechanism of his going was very wrong, and Thaksin's sins were no greater than those presently being committed. Whilst his virtues still stand. Thus by attacking the coup leaders for their actions, or in some cases, inactions, I find myself in the strange position of seeming to support Thaksin. I suspect many people find themselves in this position.
comment 17
Poomjai date : 27/08/2007 time : 08.45

Khun Natee, :-)

Please do try to have the last word, as I am keen to see your rebuttal. But I ask that you don't try to label me a pro-Thaksin commentator simply because of my attempt to step back and take a more balanced view - rather banal don't you think? Attack me on substance and I will gladly spar with you, in this thread or the next.

I promise always to spar with you in good humour and with an open mind. For we all share a love of this country and would like to see it prosper.
comment 16
natee date : 27/08/2007 time : 01.23
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/natee

Khun Poomjai: I contemplated not replying, for fear of sounding like a last-word freak. But goodness, the list of achievements you provided on the Thaksin regime's successes could have been used by myself as sarcasm!! Since this thread will be lost soon, I'm sure we'll carry on our agreements and differences in another thread.
comment 15
Poomjai date : 26/08/2007 time : 14.40

Khun Natee,

When was the last time you saw any country run perfectly? Policy is fluid and tacking constantly with the winds of globalisation and world trade, demographic changes, climate change, public health and natural disasters, international terrorism etc. etc. I don't think any government gets it right all the of time, because they are responding to events for much of the time.

Despite the many machinations and intrigues of governance in Thailand recently, it appeared to be on a pretty robust upward curve, facing off SARS, bird flu, the tsunami and southern insurgency reallly rather well while and posting impressive growth and reductions in rural poverty to boot.

That is.... until the coup happened. So a bit more focus on policy and a bit less moaning about the peccadillos of previous Prime Ministerial incumbents might help, just a little bit. Worthy of a try or not?
comment 14
xyzz date : 26/08/2007 time : 10.49
nationmultimedia.com

Correction--- supercilous should be supercilious
comment 13
xyzz date : 26/08/2007 time : 10.26
nationmultimedia.com

No more lobbyists needed for the Ousted PM, there is the super self-centred, arrogant, supercilous
Samak Sundaravej as his nominee[announced by himself] and as leader of the mixed Chopsuey People Power Pty. From this very moment on there will be no peaceful time in the political arena, including medias , reporters, "Moo, Ma,Kar, Kai" also included. xyzz
comment 12
natee date : 26/08/2007 time : 09.25
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/natee

Khun Poomjai: When was the last time you saw this country being run effectively? I'll settle for anyone who doesn't mess things up too badly! :)
comment 11
Ian date : 26/08/2007 time : 00.19
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/anterian36

I don't really think that Thaksin is can damage Thailand by hiring lobbyists, everyone knows that policy in America is dictated by business not sentiment. As to the image of Thailand, the current management have done more harm to that than Thaksin ever did. Even the Asian Human Rights Commission called the referendum a farce. The coup to save its face need to perform a few meaningful and beneficial activities, so far it has just created divisiveness and chaos.
comment 10
Poomjai date : 25/08/2007 time : 18.21

RedandWhite,

'Hiring a lobbyist for his own personal interest'. What do you infer from that? That this is someone exceptional and unacceptable among politicians? Hmmm.

p.s. good luck against Stoke!
comment 9
redandwhitestripes date : 25/08/2007 time : 17.55
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/reallifethailand

In fairness Pomjai, I think the "inference that all political actors are selfless" is putting words in his mouth, or rather "typing on his keyboard" :-)
comment 8
Poomjai date : 25/08/2007 time : 16.56

Khun Korbsak,

Do you really expect us to accept your inferrence that Political actors (anywhere in the world I might add), are as a general rule selfless? Or indeed that the use of lobbyists is not widespread and generally accepted by politicians and political parties? Has the political party to which you are affiliated never made use of lobbyists, political advisers, strategists or whatever you wish to call them?

And please set out in words if you will how exactly Thaksin's hiring of a lobbyist is in fact damaging this country which, yes, we do all love.

Khun Natee: you will find that political manoeuvring tends to happen in every country without necessarily derailing the policy process. Paying an interest in Thaksin is one thing and I accept your point. But do you not think that Thaksin watching and Thaksin bashing has become an obsession for the military junta, deflecting their attention from running this wonderful country effectively?

comment 7
korbsak date : 25/08/2007 time : 11.44
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/korbsak

Thaksin has been a nonissue for me for quite sometime. Unfortunately, his hiring of the lobbyist for his personal interest is damaging the country that we all love dearly. Read the line that was filed to the US senate carefully krub:
" The firm will monitor the evolution of US policies towards the interim government of Thailand or the Administration's position regarding attempts by Dr. Thaksin to return to Thailand and may subsequently undertake contacts necessary to ensure that such policies remain consistent with those currently in places."
Honestly, I hate lobbyists.



comment 6
natee date : 25/08/2007 time : 01.03
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/natee

Ian and Poomjai: Perhaps there's a valid reason Thais need to keep Thaksin in the public eye. There's no way anyone can argue that he is, for a certainty, out of our lives. In the meantime, I'd rather know what he's doing, no matter how trivial. It's better than not knowing, and being hit with a huge surprise in future! Practical reasons dictate that policy issues, in a developing country such as Thailand, takes a backseat to clever political manuevering.
comment 5
Ian date : 24/08/2007 time : 19.06
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/anterian36

I agree with Poomjai, the constant Thai media attention on the doings of Thaksin achieves no useful purpose other than to help him stay in the public eye.
comment 4
Poomjai date : 24/08/2007 time : 18.48

Khun Korbsak,

What point are you actually trying to make? Thaksin uses lobbyists? Apart from your snappy headline, it's hardly earth shattering stuff.

I wonder if, by spending less time fretting about the lobbying habits, international movements, shopping and football club purchasing antics of the former PM, more time might be available for debate on the important policy making issues of the day?
comment 3
korbsak date : 24/08/2007 time : 11.00
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/korbsak

I did provide info. on the shin deal with respect to Thaksin's offshore interest, Ample rich.
Difficult to lay it out in black and white the implication of the lobbyist deal.
BGR 's role is truely lobbying and Baker botts is more on the legal issue. I think it was a mistake to hire BB for the lobbying role. Thaksin probably was not aware that there is the lobbying report that needs to be file with the Senate. So the deal that should have kept in secret was out in open.
Thaksin has no choices but to use the foreingn voices to help him fight against the CNS.
Note that all of them are working in concert on just about every issues. Very effective and of course very expensive.

comment 2
natee date : 24/08/2007 time : 04.57
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/natee

Very interesting material here krab. It would be even more interesting if you would just lay it out in black and white. Do you know the exact impact and implications of this lobbying?
comment 1
redandwhitestripes date : 23/08/2007 time : 20.37
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/reallifethailand

Khun Korbsak, would I be correct in thinking it was you who exposed this transaction shortly after the coup? Was it you who discovered the second 'Ample Rich' firm too?
Comment

  "If you are not member, please register to comment.
It take only a few steps."


  |  
name :  
email :  
website :  
comment :  
   
   

back top

<< August 2007 >>
s m t w t f s
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31