• Yoon
  • ranking : Nation Staff
  • email : yoon@nationgroup.com
  • created : 2007-06-13
  • entry : 599
  • visitors : 285631
  • votes : 353
  • send msg :
Thai Talk
Analysis and comments on political and current affairs
Permalink : http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/ThaiTalk
Thursday , August 2 , 2007
Say 'No' to charter for democracy. Long live hypocrisy!
Posted by Yoon , Reader : 819 , 10:08:24  
Print


Don't expect any of the main players in the current political arena to admit that they are practising it. They may call it "survival politics" or even "public service".Published on August 2, 2007

 But there is no doubt about it - the name of the game is hypocrisy, pure and simple.

Those who probably think they have nothing to lose have gone whole hog for the fine art of hypocrisy. That's why you noticed no sense of embarrassment whatsoever when leading members of the Thai Rak Thai Party, who used to pride themselves as being on the "left" during the October uprisings, welcomed the arrival of the country's best-known "right-wing chieftain" into their ranks under the People Power Party. The former arch-rivals have joined together to come to the rescue of the country's most popular capitalist.

In case your memory has been blurred somewhat, remember that the same guy who became a powerful Cabinet member after the bloody, ultra-right military coup on October 6, 1976 is now poised to head a political party that comprises mainly Thai Rak Thai members who have vowed to go against the September 19, 2006 coup!

The same question must be raised over the campaign by academics who have come out to call on us to reject the constitution in the August 19 referendum, saying that it's "the only way to express our disapproval of the junta and the aristocracy".

No doubt, coups are bad and they set the country back into the political Dark Ages, but what about corrupt politicians who tried to buy the generals and at the same time gave the military an excuse to intervene?

If you go through the interim constitution with a fine-tooth comb, you would discover that if a simple majority throws out the charter draft, that would result in it being thrown back to the coup-leaders, who would then have the right to choose any of the previous constitutions and simply declare it into force immediately.

In fact, the "junta", in collusion with the military-appointed Cabinet, could make whatever additions or subtractions they like.

In other words, if you vote against the new charter on the grounds that you can't possibly agree with the September 19 coup, then some people may say that you are simply handing the power back to the same group of people you are supposed to detest. You may be accused of self-righteousness, but that's because such critics don't appreciate the hypocrites' argument that their double standards can somehow heal society's wounds, and enable people to put up a facade of taking a position on the country's crucial issues.

Isn't it because we pay respect to hypocrites that we took it seriously when some of Thaksin Shinawatra's followers set up an "independent" group by the name of the "Democratic Alliance Against Dictatorship" and proceeded to storm police barricades and shout obscenities at Privy Council President General Prem Tinsulanonda?

Hypocrisy was abundant when a leading member of the anti-Thaksin alliance turned into an anti-coup militant and described the ex-premier as "mud" when he was detained by police last week and declared that "mud" can't be cleaned up by "mud" but must be cleared out by "clean water".

Hypocrisy was also in full swing when the chairman of the National Human Rights Commission ruled, in black and white, that there was nothing wrong with a member of his commission - which used to pride itself on being politically impartial - leading the "mob" last Sunday evening to shout angry slogans in front of General Prem's house.

"It's his right as an individual," the chairman said.

Hypocrisy, it has been said, is the act of condemning another person when the critic is guilty of the same thing he is condemning. But, the same sage would also tell you that to preach against an act that you yourself have committed does not constitute hypocrisy, even if one makes an effort to conceal one's behaviour. It becomes hypocrisy, one might argue, only when it involves verbal attacks or when one demands that those guilty of committing the same act that one practices oneself be punished.

Hypocrisy can therefore, simply put, be likened to the pot calling the kettle black.

That reminds me of the dramatic statement by Colonel Potter on the television show "M*A*S*H" who declared: "Just remember, there's a right way and wrong way to do everything - and the wrong way is to keep trying to make everybody else do it the right way."


Read comment

comment 3
Ian date : 03/08/2007 time : 04.46
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/anterian36

I can fault flybike's English at times but not his logic
This referendum cannot be a step forward, it is the only sign of cleverness the junta has shown so far, it is phrased in such a way that no matter how one votes they come out the winners.
I am not a Thai, it is not for me to say what the people should do, but I know what I would do.
comment 2
Flybike date : 03/08/2007 time : 03.00
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/flybike

What I read between the lines is, that we have to choose between corrupt politicians and brave „clean“ soldiers. Now let me remind you some facts.

a)During the 8 years of Gen. Prem’s time as unelected PM there had been the same amount of corruption and abuse of power as before and under Thaksin. Gen. Prem as a PM acted when the press was writing because things became too obvious. But I do not know any case he was disrobing and dismantling politicians in his government who were corrupt before newspapers were publishing the scandal. Also the country was not running stronger. You can easily read the international ratings and analyzes. Rich became more rich, the poor ….could not come out of the misery.
b)Looking into the past, whenever military was governing; corruption and no justice had been bigger then ever. The darkest ages (for the normal Thai people) were under Thai military government. And Thai people were not allowed to learn how to live with real democracy. What is giving now the reason to the military to say “Thai people are not ready for democracy”. Since the military are in power, we can clearly see that freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of political activities are undermined. How people can learn to live with real democracy if they are not allowed to practice it?
c)You are explaining that strange political alliances are being built. But what caused this situation? The military acting in a similar way as the Americans in Iraq. Destroying the enemy disregarding the effect on economy and on political life. Both claimed to do the best for freedom and democracy. But both created anarchy and suppression. With open end.
d)You remind us that now an ex (?) right wing politician is joining with ex so called “communists” knowing that they only had been political dissidents driven out of Bangkok by the same person to whom the join now. But you also should know, that the military reinstalled ex General Pallop who’s driver had been found driving a car full of explosive may be ready to kill an elected PM (by the way what happened to this crime case under the military ruling?) and who himself committed of murdering many “communists” during the 70s in interviews to newspapers. He told us that he was reengaged to help solving the to days problems of Thailand because he had special knowledge …

We had to get rid of Thaksin but we should not have opened the way for “war profiteers” and we should not have weakened the democratic constitution in such a terrible way that we just throw them into the waste bin. How people can believe in justice if the highest laws of all can be eliminated just in a moment? It is bad enough that the constitution was and is full of SHOULDS and WOULDS which opens room for wide interpretation and loopholes. But destroying the highest law which was created to protect the people and the right of the people on one hand but making new laws like the cyber law which intention is clearly to protect the ruling people … how can Thai have confidence into such a system?

What we need and what whould give reconciliation is:

a)Reinstallation of the old 1997 charter
b)Free political activities
c)Rehabilitation of the TRT politicians who were clearly innocent *
d)Free elections within 90 days

And all this without a new ISOC law. Because WITH this law there will be no democratic development in Thailand.


*Please remember:
Sonthi said the CNS supported the amnesty wanted to promote reconciliation in the country. He claimed in the interview that Surayud supported the idea. "Most of these 111 people weren't involved with what happened,'' he said, referring to the Thai Rak Thai executives who were barred.
If someone was innocent, amnesty is the wrong solution. In that case we need rehabilitation.

comment 1
Flybike date : 03/08/2007 time : 01.40
http://blog.nationmultimedia.com/flybike

You say: "If you go through the interim constitution with a fine-tooth comb, you would discover that if a simple majority throws out the charter draft, that would result in it being thrown back to the coup-leaders, who would then have the right to choose any of the previous constitutions and simply declare it into force immediately. "

You are wrong. They do not have the right to choose any of the previous consitutions, because they got the power against the democratic rules of the country just because they used their guns and tanks.

They HAVE TO put the 1997 charter back into vigeur. This is their duty. And the democratic processes have to amend them in a way to stop power misuse.

But everybody who votes YES agrees that military power can change the political world at any time and trash any charter whenever they feel it applicable.

This is the believe of the middle age. The one who has the power can decide about the rules. In Wild West we had this situation too and many people still believe it is the right way of life. But I do not believe into self justice.

Everybody who says YES to the Charter draft agrees to an amnesty and avoids democratic installed courts to find out if the coup makers commited crimes or not.

If you vote YES, you agree that the majority of the Thai voters had been robbed by their democratic right to decide about whom they want to be their leader. He might have been corrupt and bad for the country, but still answering to non democratic acts with more non democratic acts makes the last the same evil.

And ousting Thaksin is one thing. It could have been an act of "self defence" or "emergency assistance". But all the acts around especially trashing the charter was much more. It was the changing of a political situation because a group of the society did not want Thailand to have a strong democratic government.

Stay tuned. As soon as I have more time I will you give more reasons ...
Comment

  "If you are not member, please register to comment.
It take only a few steps."


  |  
name :  
email :  
website :  
comment :  
   
   

back top

<< August 2007 >>
s m t w t f s
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31